Skip to main content

Is my foot orthotic a custom made device?

Custom foot orthotics (CFO) are prescription medical devices designed to stabilized and control the
function of the foot and its alignment with the lower leg. CFO's are used to treat or prevent injury caused by excessive motion or a lack of motion in the foot and lower leg. Your prescription CFO device is tailored to your needs and activities. Your CFO is not just a piece of plastic. Chiropodists/podiatrists are trained to prescribe custom foot orthotics. The prescription CFO is based on the findings from the description your complaint, your medical history,  a detailed biomechanical examination of your foot and lower extremity, a gait analysis of your walking pattern. All of this gathered information is used to formulate a prescription.  Your prescription could include an addition such as an accommodation to relieve pressure that is causing callus on the bottom of your foot.  Some additions can encourage joint motion or prevent joint motion. Ultimately, the prescription foot orthotic device must be tailored to your needs and activities. Unfortunately, you may not have a foot orthotic that is a custom made foot orthotic device.
There are many kinds of in-shoe devices that are referred to as  "Orthotics". You will see advertisements on TV infomercials, exhibits at consumer shows and retail stores for "Orthotics".  Shoe inserts and arch supports are be increasingly referred to as " Orthotics". Foot orthotics  are prescribed and/or dispensed by many varied health professionals including chiropodists/podiatrists, orthopedic surgeons, sports physicians, pedorthists, orthotists, chiropractors and physical therapists.  The general public will have a difficult time telling the difference between a true CFO and an over the counter (OTC) type foot orthotic without asking the right questions.  You must ask you foot orthotic provider if they are going to make your foot orthotic from a 3 dimensional cast of your foot.
The Prescription Foot Orthotic Laboratory Association(PFOLA) has developed technical standards to differentiate between various types of foot inserts(orthotics). The definitions are based on how the foot is evaluated and how the foot was casted.
The following are excerpts from PFOLA technical standards document on foot modeling and device  definitions.  These definitions are sent to extended health insurance providers to demonstrate they are reimbursing you for a true anatomical custom  made foot orthotic which is made from a anatomical volumetric 3 dimensional model.

Foot Modeling Definitions
 
Anatomical Volumetric Foot Model (AVFM)
A digital or physical model that captures a person’s three dimensional(3D) plantar foot anatomy when the foot is non-weightbearing, semi-weightbearing, or fully-weightbearing.
A physical AVFM captures foot anatomy through direct contact to duplicate plantar foot anatomy. The most common examples are plaster of paris casts or foam impressions taken directly from the foot. Any material or method that uses direct capture of the entire

plantar foot anatomy creates an AVFM.
A digital AVFM must use actual 3 dimensional (3D) data points taken directly from the foot to duplicate plantar foot anatomy. The most common examples include laser 3D scanners, stereo-digital 3D imaging systems, and pin array systems.

Extrapolated Volumetric Foot Model (EVFM).
A digital model that approximates a person’s 3D plantar foot anatomy through application of mathematical models that extrapolate pressure data, or extrapolate temperature data, or extrapolate light data to form the digital model when the foot is non-weightbearing, semi-weightbearing, or fully-weightbearing. The most common examples are pressure mapping systems, photographs and ink or carbon paper imprinting system. A physical 3D cast of your foot will not have been used to make the EVFM orthotic.

Device Definitions

Anatomical Custom Foot Orthotic (ACFO)

An in shoe device that is made directly from an Anatomical Volumetric Foot Model (AVFM). The AVFM is modified with the appropriate medial and/or lateral arch fill, lateral column expansion, heel expansion, and intrinsic forefoot and/or rearfoot corrections as defined by the prescribing chiropodist or podiatrist. The entire upper surface of the foot orthotic device matches the surface of the modified, or corrected, AVFM.

Extrapolation System Foot Orthotic (ESFO)
An in shoe device that is made directly from an Extrapolated Volumetric Foot Model (EVFM). The EVFM is modified with the appropriate medial and/or lateral arch fill, lateral column expansion, heel expansion, and intrinsic forefoot and/or rearfoot corrections as defined by the prescribing physician. The entire dorsal surface of said custom device matches the surface of the modified, or corrected, EVFM. The ESFO will not approximated the contours of your arch as well as a ACFO. If a close fit to your foot contours is required an ESFO may be contra-indicated.

Library System Foot Orthotic (LSFO)


An in shoe device that is made from a library of pre-manufactured shells, pre-manufactured corrected positive molds or pre-determined digital shape files (from which shells or molds are milled.) The foot orthotic shape is chosen by matching a library shape with either an AVFM or EVFM. Over the counter(OTC) foot orthotics are LSFO. Some of these LSFO will be used by chiropodists/ podiatrists when an ACFO is not indicated. OTC Powersteps ® orthotic supports are a good example of LSFO that might be dispensed in chiropody/podiatry office.

These industry definitions have helped to differentiate if a foot orthotic is truly a custom foot orthotic. The prospective foot orthotic patient has to be educated to ask the right question. Are you making my foot orthotic from a true representation of the surface contours of the bottom of my foot? Hopefully the answer is yes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MBT™ footwear: A chiropodist’s view of the “Physiological” footwear.

Over the past year,  I have been asked on several occasions to express my opinion on the benefits and risks of wearing  unconventional footwear such as  MBT™ (Masai Barefoot Technology) shoes , Sketchers “Shape Up”™ shoes and other similar shoes.   I have reviewed research presented at scientific seminars, talked to a MBT footwear medical representative and I have also received feedback from a few patients over the past year who have used MBT shoes or other similar shoes.  In this blog I will discuss the design of MBT footwear and its effects on the thigh and lower leg muscles while standing and walking in MBT footwear.  I will also discuss the effects on ankle joint motion while walking in MBT footwear. MBT footwear was developed in Switzerland in 1996 and came to North America in 2003.  The unstable MBT shoe has been promoted as the original “barefoot” function shoe. This shoe has a rounded sole starting from the heel and continues ...

Wearing flats over 60

Here are some tips for wearing flats if you are over 60. Generally, flats do not have much support and the toe box is narrow instead of rounded. This is also good advice for anyone under 60. https://bestlifeonline.com/flats-over-60/ Whitby Family Footcare

What are the benefits and risks of wearing MBT™ footwear?

In this blog, I will discuss the benefits and risks of wearing MBT™ footwear if you have a specific foot and lower leg problem.  To help answer this question, I have summarized feedback from various chiropodists and podiatrists from Canada and the USA gathered by Dr. Chris MacLean, Director of Biomechanics at Paris Orthotics Ltd in Vancouver, BC. Some of the benefits of wearing MBT shoes are definitely due to the rocker shaped outer sole.  A pilot study in 2005 by Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary used pressure sensing insoles inside of MBT footwear while the study participants were either standing or walking. They compared the pressure readings in the MBT™ shoes to pressure readings inside of a flat soled running shoe. The study specifically compared the peak pressures of the heel, midfoot, ball of the foot (forefoot) and toes between the two shoe groups. Results of this study showed: 1.        MBT’s de...